Operational Intelligence
for Complex System Transitions

01

Mapping decisions

Scattered across spreadsheets, documents, and consultant laptops. One change ripples across three files. Versioning is a manual ritual.

02

Client decisions

Buried in email threads and meeting notes. No audit trail. The same field gets re-asked at every status meeting.

03

Readiness

Difficult to establish from evidence. The status meeting asks "are we ready?" The answer is a feeling. The risk surfaces in production.

01 · ENGAGEMENTS

One workspace per engagement.

Source system, target system, version, deliverables, and signoff state — all in one place, with the audit trail attached.

02 · INTELLIGENCE

Field mapping + decision support.

8-stage field-mapping inference. Decimal-based confidence per field. The consultant approves, rejects, or overrides.

03 · PLAYBOOKS

Dependencies + implementation sequencing.

Dependency graphs and phase ordering for known target systems. The implementation sequence generated from the mapping.

04 · EQUIVALENCE

Compare plans, preserve differences.

Object coverage, dependency F1, risk coverage, validation coverage, execution similarity — 5 sub-scores, one weighted total.

BUILT FOR

Consultants

The people who manage engagements end to end. They review inferred mappings, run the equivalence check against their plan, generate the workbook, and present it to the client.

manage engagements · review mappings · compare plans · coordinate clients

BUILT FOR

Delivery teams

The people who run the cutover. They take the migration package — Python and SQL scripts, the mapping workbook, the validation plan, the executive summary — and execute.

execution · dependencies · validation · implementation artifacts

BUILT FOR

Enterprise programs

The people who oversee many engagements at once. They need the audit trail, the per-engagement readiness scores, and the cross-engagement pattern visibility.

multiple engagements · oversight · readiness · auditability